The short answer
- → Want auditing to be continuous: TrueClicks
- → Want auditing inside a broader optimization suite: Optmyzr
- → Want a free first pass: Adzooma
At a glance
| Tool | Best for | Meta | TikTok | Shopify | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrueClicks | Continuous Google Ads auditing and waste prevention | — | ✓ | — | — | · |
| Optmyzr | Google Ads optimization, audits and monitoring | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | · |
| GoMarble | AI ad analysis with root-cause diagnosis and in-account execution | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adzooma | Opportunity-based PPC audits on a small budget | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | · |
| Opteo | Google Ads optimization suggestions and monitoring | — | ✓ | — | — | · |
✓ supported · — not supported · · not publicly stated
How we evaluated these tools
We assessed every tool on the same 6 criteria, so the comparison stays like-for-like rather than reflecting whichever feature each vendor leads with.
Audit scope
Structure, settings, waste, tracking, feeds — how much does it actually check?
Continuous vs one-off
A snapshot you run, or ongoing monitoring that flags new problems?
Prioritisation
Does it rank findings by impact, or return an undifferentiated list?
Remediation
Can it fix what it finds, or only report it?
Portfolio scale
How well does it handle auditing many accounts at once?
Pricing model
Per account, flat tier, or percentage of ad spend?
The tools
Every entry below uses the same structure — best for, platforms, what it does, capabilities, pros, limitations, pricing, ideal customer, verdict — so you can compare like with like.
1. TrueClicks
Best for: Continuous Google Ads auditing and waste prevention
Platforms: Google
TrueClicks continuously audits Google and Microsoft Ads accounts, monitoring for performance deviations and breakages, flagging waste, and pacing budgets against targets. It is built around catching problems early rather than reporting on them later.
Key capabilities
- Continuous auditing across unlimited Google and Microsoft Ads accounts
- Monitoring and alerting when performance deviates or something breaks
- Bulk optimization to fix flagged issues at scale
- Budget pacing and KPI tracking against ROAS and CPA targets
- Automated consistency checks and waste prevention
Pros
- Spend-based pricing means cost tracks the value of the accounts it protects, and account count is unlimited
- A no-cost tier covers accounts under $50K/mo spend, which makes evaluation genuinely risk-free
- Audit and monitoring depth is its core product rather than a side feature
Limitations
- Search-only — no Meta, TikTok or paid social coverage
- Percentage-of-spend pricing becomes a significant line item at high spend
Pricing: 0.25% of ad spend; no-cost tier up to $50K/mo spend; $4,490 billed yearly at the $50K/mo tier (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Search-led agencies and in-house teams managing many Google Ads accounts
Verdict: The strongest dedicated auditing layer here, provided your spend is search-led.
2. Optmyzr
Best for: Google Ads optimization, audits and monitoring
Platforms: Meta, Google, LinkedIn
Optmyzr is a PPC optimization suite built primarily around Google Ads, combining optimizations, audits, insights and monitoring with reporting, budget management and campaign creation workflows. It is aimed at practitioners managing search and shopping at scale.
Key capabilities
- Optimizations, audits, insights and monitoring across connected accounts
- Budget monitoring and optimization
- Shopping and PMax campaign and feed management
- Reporting and dashboards
- Workflow management via Blueprints
- AI Sidekick assistant
Pros
- Genuinely deep on Google Ads specifically — audits, shopping and PMax management are first-class rather than bolted on
- Broad platform coverage for a search-led tool, including Microsoft, Amazon and Yahoo! Japan
- Built for practitioners running many accounts, with real-time data refresh
Limitations
- Tier pricing is not rendered on the public pricing page, so cost cannot be evaluated without contacting them
- Search and shopping led — creative analysis is not a focus
Pricing: Essentials, Premium and Enterprise tiers; prices not published on the public pricing page (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: PPC practitioners and agencies managing Google Ads at scale
Verdict: The most Google-native option here — strongest when search and shopping are the bulk of your spend.
3. GoMarble
Best for: AI ad analysis with root-cause diagnosis and in-account execution
Platforms: Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn, Shopify
GoMarble is an AI agent for paid media. It connects to your ad accounts, explains why metrics moved rather than only charting that they did, and then acts on that diagnosis — GoMarble AI Agents edit bids, budgets and campaign status directly, and Ad Launch ships new campaigns. Both are gated on human approval.
Key capabilities
- Root-cause analysis — decomposes a ROAS or CPA change into spend, CPM, CTR, CVR and AOV contributions
- GoMarble AI Agents — execute against their own diagnosis: bid and budget changes, pausing and scaling ads
- Ad Launch — analyzes creatives, picks the campaign, drafts brand-voice copy and ships it, gated on approval
- Execution across five channels: Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn and Bing
- Creative analysis — connects hooks, formats and angles to performance, and flags fatigue signals
- Cross-channel analysis — Meta and Google in a single account view
- Conversational reporting — ask for the analysis in chat or Slack instead of building a dashboard
- Scheduled reports and anomaly alerts delivered to Slack or email, with no infrastructure to build
- Reports that carry recommended actions, which Agents can then execute on approval
- AI agents + MCP servers — drive the same analysis from Claude or your own tooling
Pros
- Diagnosis and execution in one place — it acts on its own analysis rather than handing you a list
- Reporting is conversational rather than built — you ask a question and get the answer, instead of designing a dashboard and maintaining it
- Reports arrive where the team already works (Slack or email) and carry actions, not just numbers
- Changes are gated on human approval rather than applied silently
- Meta and Google analysed together instead of in separate silos
- Open MCP servers mean the analysis is reachable from Claude and other AI clients, not locked in a dashboard
Limitations
- Not an attribution platform — no multi-touch modelling or incrementality testing, so it complements rather than replaces Northbeam or Triple Whale for measurement
- Creative tagging taxonomy is less granular than a dedicated creative-ops tool like Motion
- Not a white-label client-reporting platform — no branded client portal or per-client packaging, which agencies reporting to many clients will still need elsewhere
- Fewer prebuilt dashboard templates than the incumbent reporting suites
Pricing: See our pricing page for current plans View GoMarble pricing →
Best suited for: Performance marketers, in-house paid media teams and agencies who want diagnosis and execution in one agent
Verdict: The strongest fit when you want the same system to work out why performance moved and then make the change, across Meta and Google together.
4. Adzooma
Best for: Opportunity-based PPC audits on a small budget
Platforms: Meta, Google
Adzooma audits, optimizes and tracks PPC campaigns across Google, Microsoft and Meta. Its core loop is surfacing 'opportunities' — suggested fixes on connected accounts — alongside performance reports, budget tracking and alerts.
Key capabilities
- Automated PPC performance reports (monthly, weekly or daily by tier)
- Opportunity analysis with suggested account fixes
- PPC alerts and budget tracking
- SEO and web metrics profiles alongside PPC
- Unlimited ad accounts connected even on the entry tier
Pros
- A no-cost tier exists, which makes evaluation genuinely low-risk
- Paid tiers are inexpensive relative to the rest of this category
- Unlimited user seats from the Silver tier upward
Limitations
- Opportunity suggestions are rule-driven — it flags what looks improvable, not why performance changed
- Reporting cadence is gated by tier: the entry tier reports monthly, which is too slow for active account management
Pricing: No-cost tier available; Silver $69/mo; Gold $179/mo (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Small teams and solo practitioners managing Google and Microsoft Ads
Verdict: Best value in the category for audit-style opportunity spotting on a limited budget.
5. Opteo
Best for: Google Ads optimization suggestions and monitoring
Platforms: Google
Opteo is a Google Ads optimization tool. It watches connected accounts and surfaces specific improvements — keyword changes, bid adjustments, traffic exclusions, budget moves — alongside performance monitoring and alerting.
Key capabilities
- Keyword management and bid optimization suggestions
- Bad-traffic exclusion and error detection
- Shopping campaign management
- Budget management and performance monitoring
- Segment exploration and Google Ads reports
Pros
- Tightly focused on Google Ads, so suggestions are specific rather than generic
- Transparent tier pricing published against clear account and spend limits
- Covers the day-to-day optimization loop rather than only reporting on it
Limitations
- Google Ads only — no Meta, TikTok or cross-channel view whatsoever
- Tiers cap both account count and monthly ad spend, so cost steps up as either grows
Pricing: Basic $129/mo (10 accounts, $25K spend); Professional $249/mo; Agency $499/mo (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Google Ads practitioners and agencies managing multiple search accounts
Verdict: A focused Google Ads optimization tool — narrow by design, and better for it.
Full capability comparison
The capability matrix, so you can answer questions like "which of these do both Meta and Google, with creative analysis?" without rereading the list.
| Tool | AI analysis | Root-cause analysis | Executes changes | Creative analysis | Attribution | Reporting | Automation | AI agents | Budget recommendations | Multi-account | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrueClicks | · | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | Custom |
| Optmyzr | ✓ | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | Custom |
| GoMarble | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | See pricing |
| Adzooma | · | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | $69/mo |
| Opteo | · | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | $129/mo |
✓ supported · — not supported · · not publicly stated. Pricing as published on each vendor's site; see the methodology note for dates.
How the tools differ
The list above tells you what each tool does. This section answers the decision question — which one fits the job you actually have.
If you want auditing to be continuous
TrueClicks
Built specifically around ongoing auditing and monitoring across unlimited accounts, with bulk remediation. The closest thing here to a dedicated audit product.
If you want auditing inside a broader optimization suite
Optmyzr
Audits sit alongside optimizations, shopping and PMax management rather than standing alone.
If you want a free first pass
Adzooma
A no-cost tier will surface obvious opportunities across Google, Microsoft and Meta before you commit budget.
If the focus is errors and waste in the core loop
Opteo
Error detection and bad-traffic exclusion on Google Ads only, at a published entry price.
If the audit needs to explain performance, not just settings
GoMarble
A settings audit and a performance diagnosis answer different questions. We do the second, which is the one a client usually asks.
Best tool by use case
Not a ranking — a mapping. Most teams need one of these jobs done well rather than the highest overall score.
| Use case | Recommended tools |
|---|---|
| Continuous account auditing | TrueClicks |
| One-off inherited-account audit | Optmyzr, Adzooma |
| Free first-pass check | Adzooma, TrueClicks |
| Error and waste detection | Opteo, TrueClicks |
| Shopping and feed audit | Optmyzr |
| Explain why performance changed | GoMarble |
What to consider before choosing a Google Ads audit tool
A settings audit is not a performance audit
Checking structure and settings against best practice is not the same as explaining why results changed. Many accounts pass a settings audit while performing badly.
Continuous beats periodic
A quarterly audit finds problems that have already cost money. Continuous monitoring catches them near the point of failure.
Prioritisation is the hard part
Any tool can return 200 findings. The value is in ranking the handful that move the numbers, which is where rule-driven tools are weakest.
Check tracking as part of the audit
Conversion tracking faults produce symptoms that look like media problems. An audit that ignores tracking will send you optimising the wrong thing.
Audit findings need an owner
A prioritised list nobody is accountable for changes nothing. Decide who actions findings before buying the tool that generates them.
This is a small market
There are genuinely few dedicated Google Ads audit products. Most tools marketed as audit tools are reporting or optimization tools with an audit view attached.
FAQ
What is the best tool to audit a Google Ads account?
Is there a free Google Ads audit tool?
What should a Google Ads audit check?
How often should you audit a Google Ads account?
Can Google Ads audit itself?
Why is this list shorter than other tool comparisons?
Methodology & sources
Product capabilities and pricing were reviewed from publicly available product documentation and pricing pages, with the check date shown against each tool above. Features and pricing change — verify details with the vendor before purchasing. Capability marks reflect what each vendor states publicly; where a capability is not publicly documented we mark it "·" rather than assuming it is absent.
- TrueClicks: https://www.trueclicks.com/pricing
- Optmyzr: https://www.optmyzr.com/pricing/
- GoMarble: https://www.gomarble.ai/pricing
- Adzooma: https://adzooma.com/pricing/
- Opteo: https://opteo.com/pricing
See what GoMarble does on your own account.
Connect Meta or Google in one click. We'll run the same analysis you just read about — on your live spend, in under 5 minutes.