The short answer
- → If waste is in search terms and settings: TrueClicks, Optmyzr, Opteo
- → If waste is in budget allocation: GoMarble
- → If waste is audience overlap on Meta: Madgicx, GoMarble
At a glance
| Tool | Best for | Meta | TikTok | Shopify | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrueClicks | Continuous Google Ads auditing and waste prevention | — | ✓ | — | — | · |
| GoMarble | AI ad analysis with root-cause diagnosis and in-account execution | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optmyzr | Google Ads optimization, audits and monitoring | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | · |
| Opteo | Google Ads optimization suggestions and monitoring | — | ✓ | — | — | · |
| Adzooma | Opportunity-based PPC audits on a small budget | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | · |
| Madgicx | Rule-based automation and execution speed on Meta | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ |
| Motion | Creative reporting and creative-ops workflows | ✓ | · | ✓ | · | · |
✓ supported · — not supported · · not publicly stated
How we evaluated these tools
We assessed every tool on the same 6 criteria, so the comparison stays like-for-like rather than reflecting whichever feature each vendor leads with.
Where it looks
Search terms, audiences, creative, placements, budget allocation — which surfaces does it actually reach?
Quantification
Does it size the waste in money, or just flag the item?
Recovery
Can it act — negatives, pauses, reallocation — or does it hand back a list?
Continuous vs one-off
Does it keep finding waste, or only when you run a scan?
Cross-platform
Search only, or search and social?
Pricing against recovery
Does the cost stay sensible relative to what it recovers?
The tools
Every entry below uses the same structure — best for, platforms, what it does, capabilities, pros, limitations, pricing, ideal customer, verdict — so you can compare like with like.
1. TrueClicks
Best for: Continuous Google Ads auditing and waste prevention
Platforms: Google
TrueClicks continuously audits Google and Microsoft Ads accounts, monitoring for performance deviations and breakages, flagging waste, and pacing budgets against targets. It is built around catching problems early rather than reporting on them later.
Key capabilities
- Continuous auditing across unlimited Google and Microsoft Ads accounts
- Monitoring and alerting when performance deviates or something breaks
- Bulk optimization to fix flagged issues at scale
- Budget pacing and KPI tracking against ROAS and CPA targets
- Automated consistency checks and waste prevention
Pros
- Spend-based pricing means cost tracks the value of the accounts it protects, and account count is unlimited
- A no-cost tier covers accounts under $50K/mo spend, which makes evaluation genuinely risk-free
- Audit and monitoring depth is its core product rather than a side feature
Limitations
- Search-only — no Meta, TikTok or paid social coverage
- Percentage-of-spend pricing becomes a significant line item at high spend
Pricing: 0.25% of ad spend; no-cost tier up to $50K/mo spend; $4,490 billed yearly at the $50K/mo tier (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Search-led agencies and in-house teams managing many Google Ads accounts
Verdict: The strongest dedicated auditing layer here, provided your spend is search-led.
2. GoMarble
Best for: AI ad analysis with root-cause diagnosis and in-account execution
Platforms: Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn, Shopify
GoMarble is an AI agent for paid media. It connects to your ad accounts, explains why metrics moved rather than only charting that they did, and then acts on that diagnosis — GoMarble AI Agents edit bids, budgets and campaign status directly, and Ad Launch ships new campaigns. Both are gated on human approval.
Key capabilities
- Root-cause analysis — decomposes a ROAS or CPA change into spend, CPM, CTR, CVR and AOV contributions
- GoMarble AI Agents — execute against their own diagnosis: bid and budget changes, pausing and scaling ads
- Ad Launch — analyzes creatives, picks the campaign, drafts brand-voice copy and ships it, gated on approval
- Execution across five channels: Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn and Bing
- Creative analysis — connects hooks, formats and angles to performance, and flags fatigue signals
- Cross-channel analysis — Meta and Google in a single account view
- Conversational reporting — ask for the analysis in chat or Slack instead of building a dashboard
- Scheduled reports and anomaly alerts delivered to Slack or email, with no infrastructure to build
- Reports that carry recommended actions, which Agents can then execute on approval
- AI agents + MCP servers — drive the same analysis from Claude or your own tooling
Pros
- Diagnosis and execution in one place — it acts on its own analysis rather than handing you a list
- Reporting is conversational rather than built — you ask a question and get the answer, instead of designing a dashboard and maintaining it
- Reports arrive where the team already works (Slack or email) and carry actions, not just numbers
- Changes are gated on human approval rather than applied silently
- Meta and Google analysed together instead of in separate silos
- Open MCP servers mean the analysis is reachable from Claude and other AI clients, not locked in a dashboard
Limitations
- Not an attribution platform — no multi-touch modelling or incrementality testing, so it complements rather than replaces Northbeam or Triple Whale for measurement
- Creative tagging taxonomy is less granular than a dedicated creative-ops tool like Motion
- Not a white-label client-reporting platform — no branded client portal or per-client packaging, which agencies reporting to many clients will still need elsewhere
- Fewer prebuilt dashboard templates than the incumbent reporting suites
Pricing: See our pricing page for current plans View GoMarble pricing →
Best suited for: Performance marketers, in-house paid media teams and agencies who want diagnosis and execution in one agent
Verdict: The strongest fit when you want the same system to work out why performance moved and then make the change, across Meta and Google together.
3. Optmyzr
Best for: Google Ads optimization, audits and monitoring
Platforms: Meta, Google, LinkedIn
Optmyzr is a PPC optimization suite built primarily around Google Ads, combining optimizations, audits, insights and monitoring with reporting, budget management and campaign creation workflows. It is aimed at practitioners managing search and shopping at scale.
Key capabilities
- Optimizations, audits, insights and monitoring across connected accounts
- Budget monitoring and optimization
- Shopping and PMax campaign and feed management
- Reporting and dashboards
- Workflow management via Blueprints
- AI Sidekick assistant
Pros
- Genuinely deep on Google Ads specifically — audits, shopping and PMax management are first-class rather than bolted on
- Broad platform coverage for a search-led tool, including Microsoft, Amazon and Yahoo! Japan
- Built for practitioners running many accounts, with real-time data refresh
Limitations
- Tier pricing is not rendered on the public pricing page, so cost cannot be evaluated without contacting them
- Search and shopping led — creative analysis is not a focus
Pricing: Essentials, Premium and Enterprise tiers; prices not published on the public pricing page (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: PPC practitioners and agencies managing Google Ads at scale
Verdict: The most Google-native option here — strongest when search and shopping are the bulk of your spend.
4. Opteo
Best for: Google Ads optimization suggestions and monitoring
Platforms: Google
Opteo is a Google Ads optimization tool. It watches connected accounts and surfaces specific improvements — keyword changes, bid adjustments, traffic exclusions, budget moves — alongside performance monitoring and alerting.
Key capabilities
- Keyword management and bid optimization suggestions
- Bad-traffic exclusion and error detection
- Shopping campaign management
- Budget management and performance monitoring
- Segment exploration and Google Ads reports
Pros
- Tightly focused on Google Ads, so suggestions are specific rather than generic
- Transparent tier pricing published against clear account and spend limits
- Covers the day-to-day optimization loop rather than only reporting on it
Limitations
- Google Ads only — no Meta, TikTok or cross-channel view whatsoever
- Tiers cap both account count and monthly ad spend, so cost steps up as either grows
Pricing: Basic $129/mo (10 accounts, $25K spend); Professional $249/mo; Agency $499/mo (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Google Ads practitioners and agencies managing multiple search accounts
Verdict: A focused Google Ads optimization tool — narrow by design, and better for it.
5. Adzooma
Best for: Opportunity-based PPC audits on a small budget
Platforms: Meta, Google
Adzooma audits, optimizes and tracks PPC campaigns across Google, Microsoft and Meta. Its core loop is surfacing 'opportunities' — suggested fixes on connected accounts — alongside performance reports, budget tracking and alerts.
Key capabilities
- Automated PPC performance reports (monthly, weekly or daily by tier)
- Opportunity analysis with suggested account fixes
- PPC alerts and budget tracking
- SEO and web metrics profiles alongside PPC
- Unlimited ad accounts connected even on the entry tier
Pros
- A no-cost tier exists, which makes evaluation genuinely low-risk
- Paid tiers are inexpensive relative to the rest of this category
- Unlimited user seats from the Silver tier upward
Limitations
- Opportunity suggestions are rule-driven — it flags what looks improvable, not why performance changed
- Reporting cadence is gated by tier: the entry tier reports monthly, which is too slow for active account management
Pricing: No-cost tier available; Silver $69/mo; Gold $179/mo (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Small teams and solo practitioners managing Google and Microsoft Ads
Verdict: Best value in the category for audit-style opportunity spotting on a limited budget.
6. Madgicx
Best for: Rule-based automation and execution speed on Meta
Platforms: Meta, Google, TikTok, Shopify
Madgicx bundles automation, targeting, analytics and ad management for Meta ads, with a separate Tracking Pro add-on for advanced server-side attribution. It is built for teams that already know the play they want to run and need it executed consistently.
Key capabilities
- Rule-based automation on bids, budgets and creative rotation
- Meta-specific targeting and ad management
- Server-side tracking and attribution via the Tracking Pro add-on
- Creative and performance reporting for Meta
Pros
- Mature Meta-specific automation — strong when the playbook is already defined
- Set-and-forget rules reduce manual account maintenance
- Advanced attribution available as an add-on
Limitations
- Automation-led — it executes a playbook rather than diagnosing why performance moved
- Headline pricing is not published as a fixed tier; it is calculated from your ad spend in-product
Pricing: Pro Complete with AI — price calculated from your monthly ad spend band, shown in-app; Tracking Pro add-on $49/mo (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Performance marketers running Meta at scale who need execution speed
Verdict: Best when you know what to do on Meta and want it automated, not diagnosed.
7. Motion
Best for: Creative reporting and creative-ops workflows
Platforms: Meta, TikTok
Motion describes itself as a fully integrated AI creative strategy system with a workflow builder powered by your ad data and tags. It organises ad creative at scale, builds creative leaderboards, and supports the day-to-day reporting rhythm of an in-house creative team.
Key capabilities
- Tag-based organisation of ad creative at scale
- Creative leaderboards and creative reporting
- Workflow builder driven by ad data and tags
- Multi-account support for creative teams
Pros
- Best-in-class tag taxonomy for organising creative at volume
- Built around how creative teams actually work day to day, not retrofitted from a media tool
- Creative leaderboards designed for in-house creative ops
Limitations
- Creative-first by design — less depth on media-side diagnosis such as auction or budget drivers
- Entry tier is priced for brands already spending meaningfully on paid
Pricing: From $750/mo (Starter, up to $50K/mo ad spend); Pro $1,200/mo; Growth custom (checked September 2026)
Best suited for: Creative teams and creative strategists at brands running paid at scale
Verdict: If the primary job is creative tagging and creative reporting, Motion is the more specialised choice.
Full capability comparison
The capability matrix, so you can answer questions like "which of these do both Meta and Google, with creative analysis?" without rereading the list.
| Tool | AI analysis | Root-cause analysis | Executes changes | Creative analysis | Attribution | Reporting | Automation | AI agents | Budget recommendations | Multi-account | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrueClicks | · | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | Custom |
| GoMarble | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | See pricing |
| Optmyzr | ✓ | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | Custom |
| Opteo | · | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | $129/mo |
| Adzooma | · | · | ✓ | · | · | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | $69/mo |
| Madgicx | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | · | ✓ | ✓ | Custom |
| Motion | ✓ | · | — | ✓ | · | ✓ | · | · | · | ✓ | $750/mo |
✓ supported · — not supported · · not publicly stated. Pricing as published on each vendor's site; see the methodology note for dates.
How the tools differ
The list above tells you what each tool does. This section answers the decision question — which one fits the job you actually have.
If waste is in search terms and settings
TrueClicks, Optmyzr, Opteo
Search-side waste is the most findable kind, because search terms are inspectable. All three reach it; TrueClicks does it continuously across unlimited accounts.
If waste is in budget allocation
GoMarble
Money sitting in campaigns that cannot convert it is invisible to search-term tools. Diagnosing where budget should be instead — and moving it, with approval — is the harder half.
If waste is audience overlap on Meta
Madgicx, GoMarble
Ad sets bidding against each other inflate CPMs with no obvious symptom. This never appears in a search-term report.
If waste is over-funded creative
Motion
Spend concentrating on creative that has stopped performing is a creative-analytics question rather than an account-settings one.
If you want a free first look
Adzooma
A no-cost tier surfaces rule-driven opportunities across Google, Microsoft and Meta.
Best tool by use case
Not a ranking — a mapping. Most teams need one of these jobs done well rather than the highest overall score.
| Use case | Recommended tools |
|---|---|
| Wasteful search terms | TrueClicks, Optmyzr, Opteo |
| Audience overlap | Madgicx, GoMarble |
| Over-funded creative | Motion, GoMarble |
| Budget misallocation | GoMarble |
| Continuous waste monitoring | TrueClicks |
| Free first scan | Adzooma |
| Recover it automatically | GoMarble, Optmyzr, Madgicx |
What to consider before choosing a wasted spend tool
Waste is not only irrelevant clicks
The obvious form is a bad search term. The expensive forms are budget parked where it cannot convert, and audiences competing with each other — neither shows up as an obviously bad line item.
Meta and Google hide waste differently
Google exposes search terms, so waste is inspectable. Meta does not expose equivalent detail, so waste surfaces as inflated CPMs and overlapping delivery instead.
Pausing is not always recovery
Cutting a high-CPA ad set can remove the prospecting that fed everything else. Confirm what a line item contributes before removing it.
Size the waste before acting
A list of 400 flagged terms totalling 2% of spend is not a priority. Tools that quantify in money rather than count are more useful than they first look.
Tracking faults look like waste
Spend with no recorded conversions may be a pixel problem rather than a performance problem. Verify tracking before cutting anything.
Waste returns
A one-off cleanup decays. Whatever created the waste — automated expansion, broad match, creative fatigue — is still running.
FAQ
What is the best tool for finding wasted ad spend?
How much ad spend is typically wasted?
Where does wasted spend usually hide?
Can these tools recover the waste automatically?
Does pausing high-CPA campaigns reduce waste?
How often should I check for wasted spend?
Methodology & sources
Product capabilities and pricing were reviewed from publicly available product documentation and pricing pages, with the check date shown against each tool above. Features and pricing change — verify details with the vendor before purchasing. Capability marks reflect what each vendor states publicly; where a capability is not publicly documented we mark it "·" rather than assuming it is absent.
- TrueClicks: https://www.trueclicks.com/pricing
- GoMarble: https://www.gomarble.ai/pricing
- Optmyzr: https://www.optmyzr.com/pricing/
- Opteo: https://opteo.com/pricing
- Adzooma: https://adzooma.com/pricing/
- Madgicx: https://www.madgicx.com/pricing
- Motion: https://motionapp.com/pricing/
See what GoMarble does on your own account.
Connect Meta or Google in one click. We'll run the same analysis you just read about — on your live spend, in under 5 minutes.